|
Post by incognet on Nov 18, 2015 13:53:06 GMT 3
|
|
|
Post by CMDR Mendelt on Nov 19, 2015 11:49:52 GMT 3
Looks nice.
You might want to look at downgrading SCB's to B grade. They have less MJ per charge but more charges and higher total MJ. The B class are less energy hungry too.
I also like having more lower class SCB's. instead of one high class, more MJ per tonne. The 5B is 800 MJ total for example and weighs 32T while the 3B is 575 MJ and 8T, two of those will give you 25% more MJ for half the weight. And power use per MJ is a bit lower too although total power use will go up because of more MJ.
This works for me as I like to use SCB's early and often. If you tend to use them at the last moment a lower number of high charges might work better for you.
|
|
|
Post by incognet on Nov 19, 2015 11:51:56 GMT 3
I may need to completely re-think these, as changes to SCB (witnessed in 1.5 Beta) make heat damage a concern.
|
|
|
Post by Admin on Nov 19, 2015 13:29:55 GMT 3
Ive joined the python club today
|
|
|
Post by incognet on Nov 19, 2015 13:35:23 GMT 3
Ive joined the python club today It's a great club... but expensive to join!
|
|
|
Post by CMDR Mendelt on Nov 19, 2015 14:45:21 GMT 3
I may need to completely re-think these, as changes to SCB (witnessed in 1.5 Beta) make heat damage a concern. Yeah. We might need to fit heat sink launchers with our SCB's. And maybe B grade will become even better due to the lower charges. I would hope that means lower heat generation.
|
|